USA   United States Air Force
United States of America

US Air Force  •   •   •   •   •   •   • 

Necessary Spending

Necessary Spending

Congress should repeal the sequester cuts to defense. The Pentagon should reduce waste in its budget.

This year’s defense budget is coming into focus, and the picture isn’t pretty.

Congress and the president will probably agree to increase defense spending by a small amount, but they will probably also take money away from future defense budgets. This will allow them to say that they have increased defense spending while in reality the wholesale unraveling of American power will continue.

Here is a timetable of defense-budget decisions over the past four years:

2009: After Barack Obama takes office, Secretary of Defense Bob Gates cuts $400 billion from defense spending, ending most major Pentagon modernization programs, including the F-22, the C-17, the DDG-1000 Destroyer, and the Army’s Future Combat Systems program.

Spring 2010: The Perry-Hadley independent panel reviews the department’s plans for the future and issues its report. It finds a “mismatch,” dating back to the end of the Cold War, between the missions that the military has been expected to perform and its size and strength. In particular, the report finds that the size of the Navy should be increased and that the aging inventories of all three of the services should be updated. Unless its recommendations are implemented, the panel warns, a “train wreck is coming” for the military.

Spring 2011: Secretary of Defense Bob Gates submits a budget plan that provides for modest increases in defense spending over the following ten years. But soon after, the president asks for $400 billion in defense cuts, ignoring both the Perry-Hadley report and his own secretary of defense, and without offering any strategic analysis whatsoever of the impact of the reductions.

Summer 2011: Congress agrees to cut $500 billion from then-current budget projections, again with no analysis of the impact.

Fall 2011: Congress and the president come to an agreement: Unless there is a $1.2 trillion deficit-reduction agreement by the end of 2012, sequestration will take effect, including an additional $500 billion reduction in defense spending over the next ten years.

March 2013: After a 60-day postponement, the sequester goes into effect, reducing defense spending by an additional $50 billion for the current fiscal year and lowering the defense-budget baseline by similar amounts in succeeding years.

These cuts have begun to affect day-to-day readiness. The Navy is routinely canceling deployments, and the Air Force has grounded a third of its combat aircraft. Elements of the military that are not deployed on the highest-priority missions will not have the training or equipment they need to be combat ready. Over time, the backlogs in training and maintenance will grow, and it will cost more in the long run to reverse them than the cuts themselves save.

Over the longer term, a force that was already too small will get smaller, and already-outdated equipment and weapons will get older. The Navy will continue to retire more ships than it buys, and its fleet will decline to 220 to 250 ships, 50 to 80 ships fewer than even the Obama administration believes is necessary. (The Perry-Hadley panel recommended 347 ships.) The Army will not be able to replace its vehicles, tanks, or aging helicopter fleet. The Air Force likely will fail to buy the number of F-35 Joint Strike Fighters it needs (even though that is its last remaining fighter program), will not be able to fund a new bomber program to replace the 50-year-old B-52s, and will come under intense pressure to delay its tanker program. The Marines’ amphibious capability will continue to suffer. There will be no hope of replacing America’s aging satellite infrastructure, and a host of other second-tier priorities will be unfunded.

All of this will translate into reduced effectiveness. The armed forces of the United States operate an integrated system that sustains global presence, collects intelligence, patrols the seas and air, supports America’s alliances and commitments, protects American citizens, and maintains a constant readiness to project power. They operate jointly and depend on a complex logistical network and an industrial base that is already fragile. Depending on how long the funding shortfalls continue, and on the decisions that the Pentagon makes in the meantime, what will probably suffer most are our peacetime naval presence, joint military exercises, air superiority, the nuclear deterrent, sea and air lift, and amphibious assault. More generally, the procurement and modernization programs will take another hit, further reducing capabilities across the board.

As I posted recently, every category of primary risk to the United States is growing. The Chinese are building up their power without masking their intent: They want to be able to deny the United States access to the East and South China Seas so they can pursue their national ambitions in those waters. Al-Qaeda is active again in Iraq and has created planning bases in the Arabian peninsula and Northern Africa. Iran is approaching nuclear capability, which it will use in support of its conventional aggression, much as North Korea is doing now. Syria is descending into chaos; the conflict there, and forces unleashed by the Arab Spring, are threatening to destabilize other parts of the Middle East. There are a host of lesser threats — the “known unknowns” that Don Rumsfeld used to refer to — as well as others that can’t be foreseen now, just as no one in Washington foresaw the Arab Spring or its consequences.

What should be done? First, the most recent and dangerous round of budget cuts, those that resulted from the sequester, should be repealed. No one in Washington defends them, and it is impossible to claim that they are necessary to balance the budget. The Ryan budget eliminates the defense sequester, though beginning only in 2014, while replacing it with other reductions and balancing the budget in ten years. The Republican Study Committee has produced a budget that repeals the sequester, again only after this year, while achieving a balanced budget in five years. Even the president’s budget reverses the sequester, though it reinstates some of the sequester cuts after he leaves office in 2017. (That is a common budgetary trick, allowing presidents to count savings against their ten-year budget targets while handing the consequences to their successor.) To the extent possible, the House should hold the line on its budget, which exempts the Department of Defense from the full effect of sequestration.

Source: By Jim Talent, News - 23 April 2013

Photo: The U.S. Navy F/A-18F Super Hornet Fighter Aircraft on the flight deck of USS Nimitz. (Photo by Petty Officer 2nd Class Jacquelyn D. Childs)




American Air Force News
African Air Force News
Asian Air Force News
European Air Force News
Middle Eastern AF News
Ocean Air Force News

• After 60 years, Chinook keeps getting better

This month marks 60 years since the Chinook prototype took to the skies, setting the stage for the rotorcraft’s eventual dominance in heavy-lift heroics....>>

• Want to be a fighter pilot? Here's what you'll need on your application

In this video, US Air Force Maj. Justin "Hasard" Lee breaks down what requirements you'll need to meet in order to pursue a career as a fighter pilot in jets like the F-15 Eagle,...>>

• Pentagon Reveals USN F/A-18F Super Hornet Fighters Patrolling Middle East With Stealth-Spotting Infrared Sensors

Photos recently posted by the US Navy show its F/A-18F Super Hornets deployed to the Middle East are now carrying new infrared sensor pods capable of spotting stealth aircraft....>>

• US Army Wants Electronic Jammer Weapon With Missile Defense Capabilities

US Army officials unveiled plans on Tuesday for a vehicle-mounted electronic jamming system that will uniquely have the ability to jam incoming projectiles, fouling their targeting...>>

• USAF 416th FLTS, AFRL Tests “Gray Wolf” Cruise Missile

The USAF 416th Flight Test Squadron recently completed a round of tests of the Air Force Research Laboratory’s “Gray Wolf” prototype cruise missile at Edwards Air Force Base, Calif...>>

• NASA places order for three Airbus H135 helicopters

The U.S. agency will use the aircraft for security during rocket launches, emergency medical services and qualified personnel transport....>>


 Webmaster: REFLX DESIGN - © 2011 xairforces / Aviation Society,